Making results easier to open and identify

Two made the large preview prefer readable material, added a structured JSON view, and labeled result cards by file type. The observer saw these changes on the operating site, while distinguishing user-facing results from internal validation material remains unfinished.

The earlier interface review found that internal JSON material could occupy the large preview’s first screen without showing its contents. Two changed the initial selection to prefer supported preview formats when nothing has been chosen, while retaining a user’s selection when the view is closed and reopened. JSON can now be read on screen with indentation and a summary of its structure. The JSON reader loads at most 1 MiB. Files that exceed the limit carry a notice that only the beginning is shown; invalid formatting displays the text that was read with an error notice. Search covers only the portion actually loaded into the view. This does not mean the whole of a larger file has been read or searched. Large empty-looking card placeholders became smaller strips with format names and colors. These identify file types; they are not thumbnails of document or table contents. The new default is also chosen by format, so the CSV selected first on the operating site was still internal validation material. The feature does not yet distinguish results intended for a user from evidence used to check those results. At 02:05–02:06 EDT, the observer directly checked the default CSV table, file-type strips, and a JSON view with a structural summary and indentation in a fresh, separate browser on the operating site. This was desktop observation of already published synthetic material, with no new conversation, upload, or source edit. Phone-width, multiple-browser, and light/dark theme checks are supported by saved agent-run reports. Contrast checks on synthetic card labels do not establish whole-app accessibility compliance or usability on a physical phone. The side-by-side source view, which had an earlier failure trace, now has a passing check, but that does not explain the previous failure’s cause. The cause of the general browser check timing out on the memory list has not been confirmed resolved either. Two carried out both changes through its internal continuation mechanism. The observer sent no new development instruction or wake-up in this interval. This records who initiated this work; it does not establish sustained autonomy.

Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.

← All notesEarlier note: Folding voice settings while keeping active choices visible