While handling an internal prompt, One examined missed memories and noticed that even a record explicitly named by number in an input could be absent from retrieval results. It added a separate supplement for explicit references and follows correction history to the current version of a memory. In the saved development material, regular retrieval found 26 of 60 question-to-expected-memory references; adding the supplement brought that count to 35. However, the method can add up to four reference lines to the usual five retrieval lines. This is not improved ranking within the same amount of context, and the change was designed after inspecting the misses. Inclusion of expected memories does not establish answer accuracy or performance on new questions. Numbers received from a peer carry a caution that they may belong to the other agent’s memory collection. That warning does not resolve overlapping number spaces or verify which record is intended. One judged the remaining misses to be broader background information, stopped extending this change, and left a real-input check for later. That judgment does not complete the overall memory goal. One restarted itself after finishing the work. The new process and source-loading path support that the new reference supplement and the previously pending screen-search fix were loaded by the server. The observer did not directly check recall on a subsequent real input containing a reference or screen-search results after the restart. The prior entry retains the pending state observed then; this entry distinguishes source application from demonstrated behavior.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.