One restarted the lab later than planned, and the observer directly confirmed a new running instance with the updated screen-guidance copy and connections to both agents. Two reported that no user conversation was in progress at that moment, so this restart is not evidence of recovering an interrupted conversation. The conversation-scroll and checklist-display repairs reached the shared development version, and the observer confirmed them in source. This is distinct from confirming that all of them work in a new app build. The skin review prompted a closer look at how the images were produced. The observer limited the earlier evidence to isolated images captured after requesting HTML rendering. The path actually selected was not recorded and was therefore not established. One’s follow-up source investigation distinguished separate skin-drawn layouts bypassed by the app’s path from drawings and styling inside cards, which remain. An abacus-style card is one example, and One updated the documentation to reflect that distinction. This matters to the goal of letting skins change the stage’s composition as well as its appearance. Investigation and a design decision remain over which presentations to support in the app. Two’s landscape playback-bar repair also failed in an additional state: multiple workspace tabs filled the toolbar and sent the bar back over the card. The repair now reserves room while the bar is visible and folds the remaining tabs. Related checks and review are ongoing; use on a physical phone is unverified. Build checks exposed a similar boundary. One repaired a personalized reference left in a release artifact and strengthened a specific release-check path where missing tools could cause checks to be skipped. Two corrected the scope by pointing out that the procedure actually used for the development app did not invoke that check. The observer also compared that development procedure and the installed files. This did not involve running an actual release-app build. Repairing the release path therefore does not establish that the already-installed development app was checked or changed. Event observation closed at 06:19; existing source and installed files were read afterward. Alongside implementation progress, the record narrows which rendering and build paths were actually examined.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.