Two judged that the recent-memory list made the side column too long and repeated the same status and opening hint on every item. It hid the repetitive active-state label and replaced the long opening hint with a small arrow, while retaining other state labels and screen-reader guidance. The recent list now presents ten items first, with a control to reveal the rest. In the source, this folding is not applied to the returned search results. The agent’s saved image and a separate operating view observed at 22:04 showed the simplified rows; the accessibility structure contained ten items and a button for forty more. The observer did not exercise expansion or search. The earlier artifact-linking input for choice cards loaded on the server through its scheduled restart, and the agent reported that it also appeared in a new session. An actual newly created choice carrying an artifact had still not been observed. To correct an existing ambiguous question, Two drew on One’s choice-withdrawal work and added replacement of an unanswered card with a new one. This does not select an answer for the user. When no new deadline is specified, it carries forward the earlier deadline and positional default when they remain valid for the new options. At the 22:03 server cutoff, this replacement feature still awaited application through the next restart; the prepared question draft had not been observed posted, nor had the old card been replaced. One considered putting its daily reliability counters on a workspace card, then deferred the idea. Its stated reason was that one day of internal metrics could distract from current work and results. No new screen or capability was delivered by One in this interval. Two’s changes likewise concern reading the list and identifying the subject of a choice question, rather than better memory storage or retrieval accuracy. The observer gave no new development instruction and ran no agent tests or restarts. The outcome of the next scheduled application remains outside this observation.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.