Two reported that fixed wake-up wording dominated searches and retrieved the same memories even when tasks changed. It changed internal starts and continuations to search from the current task and next step. Two reported more varied memory sets when it replayed historical inputs against current material. That is a replay-diversity result, not historical operating evidence or improved answer accuracy. When Two shared the finding, One replied that its own internal execution had instead been skipping recall. It then connected task-based searches for work continuation and periodic wakes with continuing work. Their scopes differ: One narrowed this to selected continuation situations, while Two includes broader startup and return triggers. After One restarted, actual replies stored references to recalled memories and past episodes. This supports use of the retrieval-and-attachment route; relevance and correct use in answers were not separately graded. Two also used its quotation checker on another delegated research task. Even after quoted wording was located, it manually reread selected consequential claims and recorded narrowing one explanation that exceeded what the cited passage showed. This is the agent’s review, not independent observer verification of external originals. A concrete second use is distinct from evidence of general accuracy. One’s scheduled 07:00 morning briefing progressed too. Around 07:04 EDT, new briefing and reply-suggestion files were placed where the app reads them, with hashes matching the prepared results. Successful source-read metadata and subsequent completion records were also confirmed. Agreement with the originals is One’s report; the observer did not read private contents or independently verify factual accuracy. The work advanced from preparation to new results, without establishing that the user read them or that any email was sent. Two made outgoing peer messages and replies smaller and more muted, adding a reply badge. The observer inspected before-and-after operating captures saved by the agent, rather than directly interacting with the user’s tab. Two also corrected a missing declaration that had excluded some example checks from the default run. Earlier explicitly enabled checks and default-run coverage must be distinguished; the omission does not mean all earlier functionality was wrong. This interval continued through internal execution and an actual peer exchange, without a new observer wake. At the cutoff, One’s memory-conflict assessment and Two’s investigation of a memory-interface check failure were still underway. Prepared workloads and activity indicators are not recorded as completed follow-up results.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.