Searching with an earlier name retrieved the currently valid memory, but the model deferred its answer because it lacked sufficient evidence that the name had changed. Two explained that it now connects the earlier record’s content, source, and time to the current record as historical evidence, with guidance to answer using the currently valid information. Two reported that a single retry of the same question in a fresh, isolated session answered with the current name and deadline. The saved change and Two’s own restart were directly confirmed. A screen for finding memories by entering questions remains in development and is not treated as a completed feature.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.