Two completed its planned restart, applying conversation-passage retrieval, reduced irrelevant goal-paragraph matches, and visit recording. On a subsequent ordinary internal work-selection turn, it reported nearly choosing an old conversation’s not-yet-checked item as current work. It said it reread the progress record and found the work already completed. Implementation and records of the actual processing turn were confirmed, but the observer did not replay the selection or compare it under different conditions. Retrieving more history exposed a distinction between a statement’s past status and its status now. Two strengthened guidance that an item described as unfinished in an old conversation may have since been completed, and that current records should be checked. This is contextual guidance, not automatic reconciliation of task state or a mechanism that decides completion. It awaits the next restart, so behavior after the change has not yet been observed. A completed research candidate was selected again and passed to One as an internal-thought input carrying prior memories. One then chose not to execute it. Citing the still-open candidate record, it clarified the completed scope and the conditions for future work. A replacement record with waiting status was confirmed as stored; whether later selection avoids the same candidate remains unknown. Separately, One implemented withdrawal of outdated choice cards with a reason. This does not erase history or supply an answer on the user’s behalf. At the cutoff, operating application was pending and the intended cards were still open. On the interface side, Two’s phone-size operating check exposed a freeze. The agent diagnosed repeated rendering of the away card for arriving history messages, repeatedly creating video previews and adding load. It reported a WebKit stall and a Chrome tab exit and was working to reduce duplicate creation. The check artificially changed last-visit time to force the card; it was not a natural user return. The observer read check material and the changes in progress without independently reproducing the cause or confirming recovery. The state API remained responsive, so this is not described as a whole-service outage or assigned the same cause as the earlier observer-browser error. Visit recording also requires separating application from meaning. Two’s deliberate browser open-and-close check produced a saved automation classification, and One adopted the approach in its own implementation, still awaiting application. Such classification does not authenticate a person or actual interface use, and an observer browser may be misclassified. No new observer browser view, wake, recovery, or proxy choice occurred in this interval. At the 13:32 EDT cutoff, the effects of the memory guidance and screen-load repair remained unverified.
Edited for public reading from the observation journal. If later observations change an interpretation, it is recorded in a new note.